This 2018 text is a deeply cynical and disillusioned reflection on Romanian politics, justice, and the state of the nation. It’s characterized by a pervasive sense of distrust and a questioning of established narratives. Here’s a breakdown of the key themes and sentiments:
1. The Erosion of Trust – “Who is good and who is bad?”
- Fundamental Questioning: The opening line, “Who is good and who is bad?” immediately establishes a core theme: a profound lack of faith in anyone holding power. This isn’t a simple accusation; it’s a recognition that the lines between good and bad are blurred, and likely manipulated.
- Skepticism Towards Institutions: The text isn’t asking if institutions are supposed to be good; it’s challenging whether they actually are. This skepticism extends to the legal system (DNA – Direcția Anticorupție – is viewed with suspicion), the political establishment, and even the media.
2. The Manipulation of Narrative – “Scorul” and the “Salvarea Națiunii”
- Strategic “Scoring”: The reference to a “scorul” (score) – likely referring to a parliamentary vote or some other procedural outcome – reveals a cynical understanding of political maneuvering. The fact that two PNL (Partidul Național Liberal) MPs were absent from a commission is presented not as a genuine concern but as a calculated move to influence the outcome.
- The Myth of “Salvarea Națiunii”: The reverence for the DNA as the “salvarea națiunii” (saving the nation) is treated with extreme skepticism. The text questions who benefits from this narrative and implies that it’s a tool used to distract from deeper problems.
3. Cynicism About Power and Influence – “Cine a fost atâția ani la rând cel mai puternic procuror al țării noastre?”
- The “Strong Man” Trope: The questioning of who the “most powerful prosecutor” was and what they did (or didn’t do) highlights a suspicion of concentrated power, regardless of who wields it. It suggests a concern about a “strong man” figure controlling the system.
- Lack of Accountability: The implication is that powerful figures have been able to operate with impunity for extended periods, raising serious questions about justice and accountability.
4. A Pessimistic Outlook – “Dormim și noi destul de adânc…”
- Numbness and Resignation: The phrase “dormim și noi destul de adânc…” (we’re sleeping quite deeply) suggests a feeling of being overwhelmed and paralyzed by the situation. It’s a recognition of a weary cynicism.
- Distraction through “Teatru”: The observation that “avem parte de teatru, constant” – that things are constantly staged – suggests a deliberate attempt to divert attention from the true problems.
5. Contextual Considerations (2018):
- Post-2014 Political Instability: This text was written in 2018, a period of intense political instability in Romania following the 2014 elections. The text reflects the deep-seated distrust that emerged during this turbulent period.
- Corruption and Institutional Weakness: The text is a direct response to the perceived endemic corruption and the ongoing challenges to judicial independence.
Overall, this passage is a powerful indictment of a political and institutional landscape characterized by distrust, manipulation, and a sense of powerlessness. It’s a glimpse into the anxieties and frustrations of a population grappling with a system that seemed to be failing them.
